Just Another Photo of Early 20th Century Women in Drag

This photo was found at Speedy’s Treasures in Scottville, MI. When I realized what I was looking at, I knew I had to have it.

undated photo

undated photo

The back is stamped “H.J.Hansen Photography.” Naturally I googled. (My favorite verb, barring the four-letter variety, of course.) This is all I found out so far:

Another response came from Barbara Gutschke about her father’s cousin Hans Julius Hansen a local Ludington photographer. Barbara writes “if a picture is worth a thousand words then Julius has contributed volumes to our Ludington area history.” H.J. Hansen was born in Denmark in 1882 and came to America with is parents in 1884 settling in Ludington. H.J. Hansen was one of THE photographers of the Ludington area that captured many important historical scenes as well as the everyday lives of the citizens of our community. Many of his prints survive, from schoolhouse pictures to photos of the car-ferry fleet, lumbering and more. During the Centennial he sold copies of many of his pioneer photos. If you have one of these treasures in your family album it most likely has a sticker or some other identification stating HJ Hansen; Photographer.

–David K. Petersen at Mason County Memories

I’ve seen a few similar photos from the time period and always thought they were pretty cool. It seems like dressing in men’s clothes and smoking was a popular pastime with young women of the era. Unfortunately the photo is not dated. I’d love to know the context here too, but it’s probably lost to time.

I picked up a few vintage post cards in nearby Ludington, too:



drun postcard 1910

post card copyright 1910; post office stamp Sept 30, 1911

back side

reverse of 1911 post card


post card stamped Dec 26, 1912

post card stamped Dec 26, 1912

I like the contrast between the last post card and the first picture. Is it “born in them”? One hundred years later and we’re still having the same debate.

Further proof that old books are probably haunted, or, the Newberry Book Fair Part II

Once again, I went to the Newberry Library’s annual book fair and couldn’t control myself.



Actually, that’s not entirely true. You should see how many I put back! I had nine volumes of a ten volume 1908 Edgar Allen Poe set that I decided–VERY PAINFULLY AND WITH GREAT WILLPOWER–to leave behind because one was missing. I know I will live to regret that one. Still, there’s a lot of great stuff here. One in particular had some surprises inside.


Dark green with gilt, but hard to tell because my lighting is awful

Dark green with gilt. My lighting is awful.

Continue reading

Seeing All of Us: Diversity in European History

Portrait of a wealthy African man ca.1540s

Portrait of a wealthy African man ca.1540s

In 2012, while researching a historical novel, I came across Imtiaz Habib’s book, Black Lives in the English Archives, 1500-1677. I’ve wanted to blog about it for awhile, then yesterday I saw this article: “The Missing Tudors: black people in 16th century England” posted at BBC History Magazine’s website, historyextra.com.

There have been discussions and blogs about this popping up everywhere. It seems that medieval multiculturalism is having its own Renaissance. And it’s long overdue.

Continue reading

The Winchester Austen


I wouldn’t say I’m the biggest Jane Austen fan in the world (shocking to say these days, I know) but my love of literature, history, feminist icons, and books in general means I have an interest in and deep respect for her work. I read Pride and Prejudice during my classics phase as a teenager (around the time I decided I also had to read lots of Twain, Dickens, Poe, Rossetti, and make a decent attempt at Les Mis–though I never got around to that last one). I’ve seen the Jane Austen movies and the BBC productions; I donated to the RPG and I even own the scarf.

Maybe I am a bigger fan than I admit? Except I haven’t read her other books. Yikes! In my defense, my interests tend to fall either earlier or later than the Regency period, so these haven’t been top priority. I do own a few paperback editions, but like many of the other books I collect, they’re pushed ever further down the to-read list by other that demand my attention. That might change now, though, since I found these fabulous editions, which are known as the Winchester Austen, in honor of her home and final resting place in Winchester.

If you’re a Jane Austen geek, you have to have these.

Continue reading

Commonplace Books, Then and Now

When paper became more accessible in the 15th and 16th centuries, people began keeping little books full of recipes, psalms, quotes, and prose called commonplace books, in an attempt to organize and filter what they felt was a barrage of information raining down upon them after the introduction of the printing press. (Imagine what they’d think of the internet?) They became, like their name, quite common, and the method–commonplacing– was even taught in universities. What probably began as a private practice grew into a hobby intended to be shared with any willing reader, to help them navigate a large amount of text– like a cross between CliffsNotes, Reader’s Digest, and Tumblr.

commonplace book beinecke

Commonplace Book ca. early 17th century at Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University

Of course, like most other things, the practice was still limited to those who could afford blank books or paper (which were still quite pricey for the average person) and who had the time and education to dedicate to it. Women, therefore, were largely excluded–most early commonplace books, especially those still extant, were made by men, scholars mostly, though merchants and artisans kept them as well. There are more recent exceptions to this–for example, Kate Chopin’s 19thc commonplace book survives as published in Kate Chopin’s Private Papers  and Milcah Martha Moore’s Revolutionary War era commonplace book is also in print. But the farther back in history you go, the rarer women’s commonplace books become.

elizabeth lyttleton commonplace book

A page from Elizabeth Lyttleton’s commonplace book, ca. late 17th/early18th century

Women were more likely to have books of household recipes and maybe herbal cures for common illnesses, like Jane Baber’s 17th century book of recipes below:

jane baber recipe book jane baber recipe book2


Another example of a woman’s recipe (called “receipt” back then) book from the 1600s:

Copyright Lydiard House / Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation

Lady Johanna St. John (1631-1705)

johanna st john recipe book 1600s

Johanna St. Johns’ recipe book


A stickler would say that housewives’ collections of recipes, cures, and the occasional prayer or personal musing aren’t commonplace books, but they serve the same purpose for the early modern woman as a philosopher’s notes on Biblical passages or the budding poet’s collection of bits of prose and quotes. (These books were also called miscellanies.)

Over time, commonplacing became something of an art, with great care spent in choosing passages and organizing them for an audience. They were often given as gifts and some were published and studied, like John Locke’s A New Method of Making Common-Place-Books (1706) and Commonplace Book to the Holy Bible (1725).

If you’d like to see one in person, plenty of old commonplace books can be found in research libraries and universities, as long as you qualify for a reader’s card. For instance, the Newberry Library in Chicago requires a valid photo I.D. (age 16+) and a relevant research interest to access their collection and some universities may allow non-students to use theirs.

john hancock commonplace booke 1687

John Hancock’s commonplace book, ca.1687, housed at Harvard (not the John Hancock)

Commonplace books are often referred to as antique blogs (and what are blogs, but an attempt to organize a barrage of text and information?), though technically blogs are often are more like diaries or newspapers. Tumblr and Pinterest are probably the closest thing in the blogosphere to commonplace books.

But even before the internet was widely available, I had my own scrapbooks, and I know a lot of people did the same. I realized recently that they were pretty much commonplace books, in that I collected various poems, quotes, and images that appealed to me, and that I wanted to remember. Unlike my diary, there were no personal passages, just clips from articles, pictures from magazines, and a lot of poetry cut from Sassy magazine. But there was no rhyme or reason to the order, and it wasn’t intended to be particularly pretty. Nor was it organized with any theme in mind other than “things that caught the eye of a 1990s teenage girl”:


pages from my scrapbook, ca. mid-90s


My grandmother handmade these blank scrapbooks using a technique she learned at Columbia College’s Center for Book and Paper Arts


annabel lee

Copied Edgar Allen Poe’s “Annabel Lee” ca.1994

This fabulous modern commonplace book was created by DeviantArt user Madelei in honor of the movie 9:


Commonplace Book by Madelei at DeviantArt, ca. 2012

Do a quick search and you’ll find that commonplacing is having a bit of a comeback. If you would like to start your own commonplace book, website Self-Made Scholar has an introduction and tutorial here. Or you could go the digital route and start a Tumblr account, if you haven’t already.

Leave your mark for future historians studying everyday life in the 21st century. Who knows? Your work could be immortalized in Harvard’s special collections.

Meta Reading

As soon as I stumbled upon a picture of Anne of Green Gables reading Anne of Green Gables, I knew I had to find more pictures of actors as fictional characters reading the book that inspired the film they were starring in. (That was a mouthful!) Here’s what I came up with so far:

It turns out that it’s much easier to find pictures of famous people reading than it is to find them in character reading their own character’s story. Hollywood: from now on, if you’re doing a movie based on a  book, be sure to get some photos of your stars doing this.

The Bard’s World Tour

shakespeare open folio

The first copies of Shakespeare’s First Folio came off the press in early November of 1623. To honor the 390th birthday of one of the most coveted books of all time, here is a fictionalized (but true!) account of the journey two of them took, from the printer’s shop to contemporary guarded display.

Continue reading